Sunday, January 20, 2013

Text Analysis: The Declaration of Sentiments, Seneca Falls Convention, July 1848


Elizabeth Cady Stanton was an abolitionist and leading figure of the early women’s rights movement. Elizabeth Stanton and Lucretia Mott led the first national woman’s rights convention in the United States. They wrote the Declaration of Sentiments to “demand civil liberties for women and to right the wrongs of society” (Johnson 386). This inspired many women to challenge the barriers that limited their opportunities, because for the first time in history, they are not afraid to speak up. For this reason, the Declaration of Sentiments, Seneca Falls Convention, 1848 is the beginning of the modern women’s rights movement. Having achieved Independence from Great Britain did not warrant equality for everyone especially woman and blacks. Stanton is furious about the inequality and abuse that is done to the woman and black stating that, “The general discontent I felt with women’s portion as wife… some active measure should be taken to right the wrongs of society in general, and of women in particular” (Johnson 386).
On the first paragraph, Stanton angrily states that they should be given rights because they are all created equal. God did not create one person to rule over another person; may it be woman, man or black. Stanton does not distant herself from the blacks and slaves; she sees herself as one of them. The word use of “God,” shows that she is a religious person, and believes in a higher power than just the government and men.  Stanton believes that everyone has inalienable rights: “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”. Government is built to protect these rights, and when they fail, the oppressed must stand up. Stanton gives a reason why there is Declaration of Sentiments. She feels that the government has failed to give the inalienable rights so she led three hundred reformers to undo the wrong that is done. Stanton feels that the government is despotize by men and men alone, and that women have no voice, no opinion, and no worth. Using the description, “tyranny over her,” Stanton paints an image in the reader’s mind that men are abusive and suppress women from their potential. Women feel like they are slaves, and owned because they have no freedom.
Stanton lists her Sentiments just like the Declaration of Independence in hopes that women can be freed and gain independence from men; just like how the thirteen colonies were free from the rule of Great Britain. Stanton list the Sentiments in a bullet form style and starts it with, “He” to express how badly they are oppressed. She goes on listing all the things that are immorally wrong and she pleads to the people and government that they need to have equal rights and privileges which their human rights.
The historical significant of this document is that this is the very first time that women gathered to organized a revolution for their independence. Despite of the criticism that women received, because of this document women were making strides for their independence. The struggle to gain independence and to be equal with men is now a formal, official, organized movement. Women met more to discuss women’s right and many national women’s rights organizations were built. Another meeting was held after Seneca Falls Convention which had a larger audience. This document is a catalyst in starting the fight for independence for women.
I find that the author’s argument is very convincing. It is morally wrong to oppress, belittle, and strip women with their rights. It is ironic how the thirteenth colonies fought for their independence and gained it; but then again became “Great Britain” in the face of women and black. People are all created equal and we all have equal rights.

13 comments:

  1. I agree that for the most part women were slaves in America up until the mid-twentieth century. In many ways women were identical to African Americans slaves. Those who were black could not own land, likewise for women. African Americans were denied their rights to participate in many things, including politics and church activities, women were denied such privileges too. Perhaps the worst thing of all though was how those who were women or black, in most cases, were denied an education so that they could not better themselves intellectually.

    We also cannot forget that the very definition of slave; a slave is someone's property. In most respects, women were regarded as the property of men, just like African slaves. In fact women were so similar to African slaves that the only difference between the two was that women were considered free. But women were not really free, much like how African Americans were not free after the Civil War. Despite no longer having to tend to their master's commands, African Americans could not own land, vote or be educated and in that way they were still being controlled by the white man, they were still slaves. It is disgusting how a word such as slavery could masquerade as freedom. However it is even more disgusting that it took us many years after the Civil War to realize it was not right to enslave anyone. It is truly depressing that only recently have we had a glimpse of what freedom really is and for that we should be ashamed of ourselves.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with you, however, we still don't know what freedom really is. It is true that we have seen a glimpse, but we're not there yet. Women, on average, still receive lower wages then their male counterparts. And if you're a woman you know how belittled you feel when a male technician (sometimes even a female) or mechanic, looks at you like you're just a stupid, helpless woman, who couldn't possibly know anything about technology or mechanics. This infuriates me like nothing else! I wish they would not make assumptions! I am a professional AV technician for a living! I am extremely technologically and mechanically inclined. There is nothing inherently different in the male brain that makes him any more qualified to be a mechanic or technician. These assumptions and ideologies that continue to prevail in our society continue to further oppression and condescension for women.
      The same is true when we are speaking about gay rights. If gay people continue to be treated as 2nd class citizens (being denied equal protections under federal law, and marriage equality), while still being expected to participate as a 1st class citizen (paying taxes, following the laws of the land, etc.), they will rise up even more than they have a do exactly what the women of this document set out to do.

      Delete
  2. The format used in this Declaration was very appropriate and addded to the persuasiveness of the content. Modeling this after the style of the Declaration of Independence and using the word "He" at the beginning of each sentence was very convincing. The inequalities expressed in this text were accurate for this time period. The use of strong words such as "tyranny" and "master" created an emotional reaction on the part of the readers. The writers of this text did an excellent job of expressing their feelings in regards to the treatment of women and blacks.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The format used in this Declaration was very appropriate and addded to the persuasiveness of the content. Modeling this after the style of the Declaration of Independence and using the word "He" at the beginning of each sentence was very convincing. The inequalities expressed in this text were accurate for this time period. The use of strong words such as "tyranny" and "master" created an emotional reaction on the part of the readers. The writers of this text did an excellent job of expressing their feelings in regards to the treatment of women and blacks.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is very clear that the perpetrator of woman's oppression is due from men, by the way the author repetitively states "He" when arguing and exemplifying how woman were oppressed predominantly by men. It's shocking that even with the great independence from Great Britain that it didn't open doors faster for equality between women and men, and blacks. It wasn't until election controversy that woman were looked to as a tool for building up great leaders ( sons) to lead the now free nation. Woman were always looked to as a tool to success as if we couldn't lead it or be at the center of it ourselves, women were forced to subliminally help and support men in there endeavors for America to become a great country. My point is greatly represented in the article when it states that woman weren't given the rights to an education, and they were restricted rights to vote, which gave them no direct voice or representation of what women might want or need for the new developing country. The only position that women did hold was over the house hold and even that had it's restriction, it was all based off what the man of the house wanted, she was allowed to possibly pick what meal was to be eating at the dinner table and how the house is arranged. I'am glad to say that this perception of women has greatly changed.

    ReplyDelete
  5. What the women and men who signed their name to the Declaration of Sentiments did was extremely brave. I was one of the 1st times that women in the United States had organized together to address their own freedoms. Many women had already been in the anti-slavery fight discussing the rights of black slaves and in this document they equate their own fight with the fight of the slaves. They feel they are slaves in their own right. Not being allowed property, voting rights, jobs or dominion over their own bodies. This document very clearly lays all these things out and uses argument techniques those of the time were familiar with. It is a wonderful and blunt step forward towards women's rights and the sufferage movement.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The author of this document used a lot of logic and reasoning as to why she felt that women during this time period were on the verge of revolting and had every right to do so. By laying out all the reasons as to why women should revolt the author followed in the footsteps of the founders of America, she used a manner in which people were all too familiar with. By creating a document that had the same structure and workings that the founders had when they addressed the British as to why they felt they should revolt and go against Britain’s tyranny, she was able to connect to the audience and provide an example that the men of society were all too familiar with. While it still took an additional 70 years for the workings of this document to come into play, I think that if it wasn't for this convention and the women’s declaration that it probably would have taken longer for any results to be seen and made.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Though there were many points of great injustice, I think the most prominent point was the inconsistencies it pointed out. There were the clear inconsistencies, like how when single women own land and are taxed, meaning they are treated as contributing members of society rather only when it is profitable for the government. But there were also the injustices whose true depth can only be understood when reminding readers of the struggle for human rights during the American Revolution. One example in the document is when it pointed out certain inalienable rights that the founding fathers fought for, like the right for representation when being governed, yet those same men and their successors were denying this right to half the population. Using these points against the status quo seems like it would have been an effective attention grabber, at least, and likely how the authors of this declaration hoped to inspire change.

    ReplyDelete